The Perfect Height for Urban Buildings

YouTubers Oh the Urbanity! break down the common urbanist belief that buildings should be no more than five stories high.

(Photo by Clay LeConey / Unsplash)

This is your first of three free stories this month. Become a free or sustaining member to read unlimited articles, webinars and ebooks.

Become A Member

“This is the urbanist myth that just won’t die,” Jasmine and Patrick of the YouTube channel Oh the Urbanity! proclaim.

This video dissects the commonly-held notion that the ideal building height is about five stories maximum. It’s Inspired largely by Danish designer and architect Jan Gehl’s landmark text Cities for People, in which he argues that taller buildings are out of scale with the human experience, writing “The natural starting point for the work of designing cities for people is human mobility and the human senses.” Human interaction, Gehl suggests, is only possible below 25 meters; too far above that, he says, and the contact interface changes to “views, clouds and airplanes.”

But this universal “optimal” or “ideal” building height isn’t based on any objective measure of what urban planners should be aiming for, Jasmine and Patrick rebut: “Our starting point for density is that buildings should be as tall as they need to be in order to provide abundant housing in places that people want to live.”

Now living in Vancouver, I’ve become very fond of its iconic point-and-podium towers as a perfect compromise. The streets here are filled with high-rise buildings – like, 20- to 60-stories tall – that are stepped back from the street and placed atop short “podiums” – roughly two to six stories high, typically comprising townhomes, retail and retaurants – that facing the street. The low-rise podiums extends all the way to the street, anchoring the buildings and create lively walkable neighborhoods that feel human-scale. The slimmer high-rise towers provide density that goes a long way toward meeting housing needs.

Watch the full video to hear Jasmine and Patrick’s full analysis, and be sure to check out Oh the Urbanity’s YouTube channel and Patreon.

Like what you’re reading? Get a browser notification whenever we post a new story. You’re signed-up for browser notifications of new stories. No longer want to be notified? Unsubscribe.

Aysha Khan is the managing editor at Next City.

Follow Aysha .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

Tags: inclusionary zoning

Add to the Discussion

Next City sustaining members can comment on our stories. Keep the discussion going! Join our community of engaged members by donating today.

Your Name Your Position at Your Company
Next City App Never Miss A StoryDownload our app ×

You've reached your monthly limit of three free stories.

This is not a paywall. Become a free or sustaining member to continue reading.

  • Read unlimited stories each month
  • Our email newsletter
  • Webinars and ebooks in one click
  • Our Solutions of the Year magazine
  • Support solutions journalism and preserve access to all readers who work to liberate cities

Join 1107 other sustainers such as:

  • Rodney at $5/Month
  • Chris in Chicago, IL at $10/Month
  • Anonymous at $60/Year

Already a member? Log in here. U.S. donations are tax-deductible minus the value of thank-you gifts. Questions? Learn more about our membership options.

or pay by credit card:

All members are automatically signed-up to our email newsletter. You can unsubscribe with one-click at any time.

  • Donate $20 or $5/Month

    20th Anniversary Solutions of the Year magazine

has donated ! Thank you 🎉