Help us raise $20,000 to celebrate 20 years. For a limited time, your donation is matched!Donate

California’s Lesser-Known Proposition

Last Tuesday, Californians voted to build a high-speed bullet train that will connect the state’s major cities. It’s costing them $10 billion.

This is your first of three free stories this month. Become a free or sustaining member to read unlimited articles, webinars and ebooks.

Become A Member

California’s progressivism is hard to judge after this year’s election. The same state that voted for President-elect Barack Obama also voted against the right of same-sex couples to marry. One step forward; one step back, right? Sure, until you take into consideration the fact that California voted in favor of a costly infrastructure upgrade.

Fifty-two percent of voting Californians said yes to Proposition 1A, which funds the development of a high-speed passenger train that will link the state’s major cities. It’ll cost taxpayers $10 billion, a number that’s never taken lightly. (Other public and federal funds will be used to construct the train, which will cost about $45 billion in the end.) With the support of Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, the bill went through in spite of the country’s economic anxiety – a feat that’s to be admired.

By the time it’s completed, taking the train from San Francisco to Los Angeles will be faster than riding a plane. The trip will take two and a half hours, and the train will be able to reach a maximum speed of 220 miles per hour. Don’t cancel your flights just yet, though – it won’t be finished until 2030.

Of course, it’s well worth the wait. The railway system, which will mimic bullet trains in France and Spain, will finally show other nations that our infrastructure can both function and impress. According to the High Speed Rail Authority, the new train will carry 50 billion people and make $1.1 billion in surplus each year. It will also reduce greenhouse gases, free up crowded airports and freeways and create 160,000 jobs.

What’s there not to like about it?

Naysayers say the final bill will reach about $80 billion, and that greenhouse gas effects are negligible. In times like these, they warn, we should be more careful when deciding what projects to fund. Indeed we should, which is why a railway system that generates jobs and lessens the need for more infrastructure in the future is a great investment.

The fact that 48 percent of Californians voted against Proposition 1A is disheartening. In the end, though, it’s still an admirable step forward.

Like what you’re reading? Get a browser notification whenever we post a new story. You’re signed-up for browser notifications of new stories. No longer want to be notified? Unsubscribe.

Tags: los angelescaliforniatrains

Next City App Never Miss A StoryDownload our app ×

You've reached your monthly limit of three free stories.

This is not a paywall. Become a free or sustaining member to continue reading.

  • Read unlimited stories each month
  • Our email newsletter
  • Webinars and ebooks in one click
  • Our Solutions of the Year magazine
  • Support solutions journalism and preserve access to all readers who work to liberate cities

Join 1019 other sustainers such as:

  • Anonymous at $40/Year
  • Dennis at $5/Month
  • Nikki at $10/Month

Already a member? Log in here. U.S. donations are tax-deductible minus the value of thank-you gifts. Questions? Learn more about our membership options.

or pay by credit card:

All members are automatically signed-up to our email newsletter. You can unsubscribe with one-click at any time.

  • Donate $20 or $5/Month

    20th Anniversary Solutions of the Year magazine