A New Plan in Play for Twin Cities Ballpark

A push for St. Paul’s Lowerton Saints ballpark to repurpose an old factory on the site as an amphitheater alongside the sports stadium to create a new cultural hotspot for the city.

Plans for a new minor-league ballpark in St. Paul call for tearing down an old shampoo factory now on the site. Some want to repurpose the factory as an amphitheater alongside the new stadium. Credit: Ballpark Friends and Fans

This is your first of three free stories this month. Become a free or sustaining member to read unlimited articles, webinars and ebooks.

Become A Member


A politically-minded downtown St. Paul art gallery owner is pushing an alternate plan for the Lowertown Saints ballpark, a planned $54 million new home for the state’s minor league baseball team. The plan would repurpose a vacant old Gillette shampoo factory on the site into an amphitheater, leading to “a year-round activity center for the City that can perhaps include the Minnesota Artisan Center, Twin Cities Model Railroad Museum and Minnesota Velodrome cycling center,” the plan’s author Bill Hosko said.

City officials say it just won’t work.

His plan is outlined in a YouTube video.

With Gov. Mark Dayton planning to announce Thursday the winning projects for a state-wide bonding fund — and the St. Paul ballpark expected to be one of the winners with $27 million in state money — Hosko has renewed his appeal. He wants people to call Mayor Chris Coleman to ask for more citizen input in the final design decision.

Hosko says in an email appeal that if St. Paul gets the bonding money he remains “hopeful that the people of Minnesota’s Capital City will then see more openness from Mayor Coleman and his gutsy initiation of an open, honest, city-wide debate on this issue.”
City officials responded that they’ve considered, and rejected, Hosko’s plan.

“It’s important to note we took his proposal very seriously,” says spokesman Joe Campbell.

He includes the letter that Parks Director Mike Hahm sent in March to Hosko that politely says: Thanks, but no thanks.

In the letter, Hahm says:

“Without a corresponding comprehensive site and financial analysis, too many variables remain, making it too risky for the City to support pursuing your concept at this time.

“We have worked hard over the last three years to develop a comprehensive Regional Ballpark legislative request and budget that is reflective of a detailed site analysis and various ballpark-driven needs. This process has been lengthy and very involved, and based on this due diligence, we have great confidence that our plan can be implemented to meet the various ballpark needs, while fitting within the very tight site geography and project budget.

“The potential risk to the overall project is too great for offering an alternate concept that hasn’t been fully analyzed for potential site and budget implications. Jeopardizing this project would result in not only a significant loss of economic development opportunities for the City of Saint Paul, but it would directly affect the thousands of amateur ball-players from around the region that would have called this ballpark home in the future.”
Hosko, though, says a better concept is worth a little extra time and study.

“Allowing the public to help determine the best development scenario need not be drawn out nor difficult,” Hosko wrote this week.

Like what you’re reading? Get a browser notification whenever we post a new story. You’re signed-up for browser notifications of new stories. No longer want to be notified? Unsubscribe.

Tags: historic preservationst. paulstadiums

Next City App Never Miss A StoryDownload our app ×

You've reached your monthly limit of three free stories.

This is not a paywall. Become a free or sustaining member to continue reading.

  • Read unlimited stories each month
  • Our email newsletter
  • Webinars and ebooks in one click
  • Our Solutions of the Year magazine
  • Support solutions journalism and preserve access to all readers who work to liberate cities

Join 1108 other sustainers such as:

  • Anonymous at $25/Year
  • Alison at $60/Year
  • Anonymous at $10/Month

Already a member? Log in here. U.S. donations are tax-deductible minus the value of thank-you gifts. Questions? Learn more about our membership options.

or pay by credit card:

All members are automatically signed-up to our email newsletter. You can unsubscribe with one-click at any time.

  • Donate $20 or $5/Month

    20th Anniversary Solutions of the Year magazine

has donated ! Thank you 🎉