Economic development is mostly a mystery. In every city, in any given neighborhood, on any given day, people and resources move in and out, to and from an unknowable number of places and sources. To do economic development, you don’t need to know everything, but what you know to start, and whom you know it with, can put you and your larger community on the path to equity. Or not.
For the first time in NYC, economic development can start with everyone being on the same page: the first-ever edition of “What Does Your Neighborhood Economy Look Like?,” a chart (and interactive map) created by the Association for Neighborhood and Housing Development (ANHD).
“It allows people to see that problems they might be having in their neighborhood are not exclusive to their neighborhood,” says Lena Afridi, who led the work as policy coordinator for equitable economic development at ANHD. “lt allows people to consider comprehensive economic development programs that are citywide. There’s more of a movement push when the visualization is available.”
The chart lays out 19 economic factors, disaggregating them by NYC community district. Some are obvious — poverty rates, percentage of households on food stamps, high school graduation rates, citywide economic development dollars spent. Some are less obvious, but essential to discussions of equitable economic development — percentage of local jobs paying less than $40,000/year, percentage of at-risk small businesses, percent change in land dedicated to manufacturing.
“We cut down a ton for the final chart. I would say it was almost three times the size it is now,” Afridi says.
With factors in columns and community districts in rows, the chart assigns each cell a color — red for high risk, yellow for medium risk and green for low risk. So at a glance, you can see which neighborhoods and also which boroughs are most vulnerable or most in need of economic investment. The Bronx is mostly red, Brooklyn is mostly yellow, Queens and Staten Island are yellow with pockets of red and a little green. Manhattan is mostly green.
“Trying to pick out the colors was a huge thing,” Afridi says. “It’s not just about communicating which neighborhoods are high risk, it’s also about maintaining focus on neighborhoods that are in a transitionary period and could also potentially face more risk later on.”
The chart was based loosely on ANHD’s Affordable Housing Risk chart, an annual community-by-community listing of affordable housing at risk of going market-rate.
“The housing market is this complex interaction of market forces and city programs and neighborhood conditions. Economic development is similar,” says Benjamin Dulchin, executive director at ANHD, which counts 101 community development groups throughout NYC as its members.
“Our members have done a lot on housing,” Dulchin says. “But going back to the origins of the community development movement in the 1970s, it’s not just about housing, it’s about addressing those systems that deny equal opportunity to our neighborhoods.”
As ANHD members move more and more into the economic development space, the chart is a response to that shift, meant to serve as a tool to bring together existing but siloed conversations about bits and pieces of equitable economic development. Organizing data according to community district, both charts help focus advocacy and perhaps connect new political allies that are facing similar issues in neighborhoods across the city.
“As our members are beginning to say more locally, no housing is affordable without a job,” Dulchin adds.
Asian Americans for Equality (AAFE), an ANHD member, was an early mover in the shift from just affordable housing to equitable economic development. (It’s part of an early-adopter pattern for AAFE, which in 1986, built the first NYC development that took advantage of now-ubiquitous federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credits.)
AAFE began doing economic development work, focusing on small businesses in and around Chinatown, in the late 1980s and early 1990s.
“At the time small business lending in marginalized neighborhoods wasn’t really a thing,” says Christopher Kui, AAFE’s executive director. “It wasn’t really sexy at all. There was no funding for it, but for us, Chinatown always had small businesses, restaurants and even garment workers as late as the mid-1980s and early 1990s.”
AAFE’s early equitable economic development work led to its eventual establishing of the Renaissance Economic Development Corporation, in 1997. Renaissance has since made $28 million in loans to 700 small businesses in Lower Manhattan. It’s now a federally registered CDFI, and was the third largest U.S. micro-lender by value of microloans closed in FY2015.
In addition to getting economic development discussions onto the same page vis-a-vis equity, ANHD’s new chart may also have useful implications for individual organizations. Given AAFE’s focus on equity and access, Kui says Renaissance EDC could use the chart to help know where riskier neighborhoods might need lower interest rates to drive access, and where they might charge slightly higher interest rates to help strengthen long-term sustainability.
“The more we know from a larger picture in terms of research and data and combine that with our own on-the-ground experience in terms of clients coming to us from different neighborhoods, the better we can decide where we work or what interest rate to charge,” Kui says. “Our methodology is almost the opposite of a local traditional bank.”
The Equity Factor is made possible with the support of the Surdna Foundation.
Oscar is a Next City contributing writer, and was a Next City 2015-2016 equitable cities fellow. A New York City-based journalist with a background in global development and social enterprise, he has written about impact investing, microfinance, fair trade, entrepreneurship and more for publications such as Fast Company and NextBillion.net. He has a B.A. in Economics from Villanova University.