Judge: Lyft Drivers Don’t Seem Much Like Independent Contractors

Juries could decide fate of workers’ rights at “ride-sharing” companies.

A Lyft car in San Francisco (AP Photo/Jeff Chiu, File)

This is your first of three free stories this month. Become a free or sustaining member to read unlimited articles, webinars and ebooks.

Become A Member

Uber and Lyft face the same protests from those who are — literally — driving business for the rival “ride-sharing” businesses. In separate California trials, juries will decide whether Uber and Lyft drivers should be categorized as contract workers, as they currently are, or employees — opening the door for benefits such as health insurance that the firms currently opt out of, in part to deliver cheaper fares to customers.

Being considered employees could mean better job security for drivers, who currently are subject to “deactivations” with no warning and no legal way to fight it. The companies prefer to highlight how drivers have far more flexibility than typical employees, with the ability to set their own schedule and number of hours.

According to Forbes, drivers in the Lyft case have requested to be considered employees. In the Uber case, it was the company requesting its drivers be considered independent contractors. In both cases, a judge denied the requests and turned them over to a jury.

The decisions of the juries could potentially impact a great deal of other “sharing economy” startups that operate similarly, utilizing independent contractors to minimize labor costs.

“At first glance, Lyft drivers don’t seem much like employees,” wrote U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria, the judge in the Lyft lawsuit. “But Lyft drivers don’t seem much like independent contractors either. The jury in this case will be handed a square peg and asked to choose between two round holes.”

The trials come at a time when both Uber and Lyft are expanding. Lyft raised $530 million in a recent funding round, garnering a valuation of $2.5 billion and “adding momentum to its expansion plans,” according to a Reuters report today. Uber recently lunged for $1 billion in funding to set its sights on the Asian-Pacific market.

If the juries decide to consider drivers as employees, the lucrative model could take a hit.

Like what you’re reading? Get a browser notification whenever we post a new story. You’re signed-up for browser notifications of new stories. No longer want to be notified? Unsubscribe.

Marielle Mondon is an editor and freelance journalist in Philadelphia. Her work has appeared in Philadelphia City Paper, Wild Magazine, and PolicyMic. She previously reported on communities in Northern Manhattan while earning an M.S. in journalism from Columbia University.

Follow Marielle .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

Tags: ubertaxissharing economylyft

Next City App Never Miss A StoryDownload our app ×

You've reached your monthly limit of three free stories.

This is not a paywall. Become a free or sustaining member to continue reading.

  • Read unlimited stories each month
  • Our email newsletter
  • Webinars and ebooks in one click
  • Our Solutions of the Year magazine
  • Support solutions journalism and preserve access to all readers who work to liberate cities

Join 1063 other sustainers such as:

  • F in El Cerrito, CA at $5/Month
  • Ann at $5/Month
  • Linda at $25/Year

Already a member? Log in here. U.S. donations are tax-deductible minus the value of thank-you gifts. Questions? Learn more about our membership options.

or pay by credit card:

All members are automatically signed-up to our email newsletter. You can unsubscribe with one-click at any time.

  • Donate $20 or $5/Month

    20th Anniversary Solutions of the Year magazine

has donated ! Thank you 🎉