This NYC Park Is Designed to Be Flooded

Renderings revealed for East River “flood park.” 

(Credit: The Mayor's Office of Recovery and Resiliency)

This is your first of three free stories this month. Become a free or sustaining member to read unlimited articles, webinars and ebooks.

Become A Member

An East River park that will protect residents from storm surges while providing access to the waterfront received some key community feedback this week. A series of designs — showing bike paths and play areas for children that would double as seasonal flood lands — was opposed by Manhattan’s Community Board 3, unless its conditions are met.

From the Architects Newspaper:

Mathew Staudt, senior designer at New York’s One Architecture, told the assembly that the team hoped to rely on flood walls and traditional levees, plus earthen levees as space allows, to minimize the use of functional but not-too-pretty movable gates that can close to protect inland areas from rising waters. The flood protections are built to oppose a 100-year coastal storm in the 2050s, a model that assumes 2.5 feet of sea level rise over the next three-plus decades.

The designs mirror other proposals in the Bay Area and metro Houston, where natural infrastructure like wetlands, marshes are parks are increasingly favored as ways to absorb rising tides and soak up heavy rains.

The park was originally part of the Big U Proposal, developed by BIG (Bjarke Ingels Group) with One Architecture and Urbanism, Starr Whitehouse and others and submitted to the first Rebuild by Design competition. All of the areas Big U targeted flooded during Hurricane Sandy, as Next City has covered, but the project was eventually split into two phases — the East Side Coastal Resiliency Project (ESCR), which just passed the Manhattan board, and the Lower Manhattan Coastal Resiliency Project. The ESCR will be jointly funded by the City of New York and the federal government, and is aiming for FEMA accreditation.

(Credit: The Mayor's Office of Recovery and Resiliency)

(Credit: The Mayor's Office of Recovery and Resiliency)

Access played a big role at this week’s meeting, according to the Architect’s Newspaper. Per community feedback, designers adjusted plans for a pedestrian bridge, trading a sloped walkway for a ramp and stairs, and added a new bridge with both a ramp and stairs elsewhere.

EDITOR’S NOTE: The original version of this article incorrectly reported Manhattan Community Board 3’s position on the East River Part design. We’ve corrected the error.

Like what you’re reading? Get a browser notification whenever we post a new story. You’re signed-up for browser notifications of new stories. No longer want to be notified? Unsubscribe.

Rachel Dovey is an award-winning freelance writer and former USC Annenberg fellow living at the northern tip of California’s Bay Area. She writes about infrastructure, water and climate change and has been published by Bust, Wired, Paste, SF Weekly, the East Bay Express and the North Bay Bohemian

Follow Rachel .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

Tags: new york cityresilient citiesurban designflooding

Next City App Never Miss A StoryDownload our app ×

You've reached your monthly limit of three free stories.

This is not a paywall. Become a free or sustaining member to continue reading.

  • Read unlimited stories each month
  • Our email newsletter
  • Webinars and ebooks in one click
  • Our Solutions of the Year magazine
  • Support solutions journalism and preserve access to all readers who work to liberate cities
  • Gavri in Plantation, FL at $10/Year
  • TL in Victoria, BC at $5/Month
  • Anonymous at $60/Year

Already a member? Log in here. U.S. donations are tax-deductible minus the value of thank-you gifts. Questions? Learn more about our membership options.

or pay by credit card:

All members are automatically signed-up to our email newsletter. You can unsubscribe with one-click at any time.

  • Donate $20 or $5/Month

    20th Anniversary Solutions of the Year magazine

has donated ! Thank you 🎉