State Action Threatens the Urban Vote

Republican leaders from six swing states, including Pennsylvania and Virginia, are considering changing how electoral votes are allocated. Instead of all electoral votes going to the candidate that won the popular vote, these states want to divvy them up according to congressional district.

Virginia Presidential election results broken down by county. Credit: Politico

This is your first of three free stories this month. Become a free or sustaining member to read unlimited articles, webinars and ebooks.

Become A Member

Republican leaders in six states that voted for President Obama last year are proposing drastic changes to the electoral college system, seeking to alter the way electoral votes are distributed in swing states, including Virginia and Pennsylvania, that could dilute the power of voters in Democratic-leaning urban districts.

A bill now in the Virginia senate would change the current winner-takes-all system so that electoral votes would be allocated according to the individual returns of each congressional district. This means that 11 of the state’s 13 electoral votes would be up for grabs individually, with the remaining two going to the candidate that won the most districts.

A senate committee last week moved the bill, sponsored by Republican Sen. Charles W. Carrico, Sr., to the senate floor for a vote.

During last year’s presidential election, Obama gained all of Virginia’s 13 electoral votes after having won 50.8 percent of the state’s popular vote there. Had Carrico’s bill passed before then, the president would have received only four electoral votes while challenger Mitt Romney would have received nine, despite Romney having only won 47.8 percent of Virginia’s popular vote.

A map of the election results from the Virginia State Board of Elections shows that in three of the congressional districts — two of which went for Romney — the vote was decided by fewer than 5,000 votes.

Unsurprisingly, Obama dominated the state’s more urban areas — such as Richmond, Fairfax, and Arlington and Alexandria counties — while Romney had more support in the rural areas. One could conclude, then, that Carrico’s bill would disproportionately affect urban voters, as their vote could be overridden by voters from smaller congressional districts.

Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel this month that proposed changes to the allocation of electoral votes are “something that a lot of states that have been consistently blue that are fully controlled red ought to be looking at.”

Pennsylvania Republicans have sponsored a similar bill that would disperse 18 of the state’s 20 electoral votes among congressional districts. The remaining two would go the candidate that won the state’s popular vote. As with the Virginia bill, it could have a serious impact on voter turnout in urban areas that lean Democrat.

“House Bill 94 is not designed to increase the effectiveness of our democracy,” said state Rep. Brian Sims, a Democrat, in a prepared comment. “What it is, is a clear and obvious tactic by the Republican Party… to take the next presidential election.”

Of the six states considering changes to their electoral college distribution — the other four are Wisconsin, Ohio, Michigan and Florida — only Virginia would allocate the extra two votes to the winner of the most congressional districts instead of the popular vote.

Both bills face strong opposition. Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell announced last week that he opposes the Virginia bill, while in Pennsylvania, online petitions and even a Facebook group dedicated to the defeat of that’s state’s bill have emerged before the bill has even left a house committee. A similar bill was proposed last year by Senate Majority Leader Domanic Pileggi, but the bill failed to make it out of committee.

Like what you’re reading? Get a browser notification whenever we post a new story. You’re signed-up for browser notifications of new stories. No longer want to be notified? Unsubscribe.

Tags: governancebarack obamavotingrichmond2012 presidential electionmitt romney

×
Next City App Never Miss A StoryDownload our app ×
×

You've reached your monthly limit of three free stories.

This is not a paywall. Become a free or sustaining member to continue reading.

  • Read unlimited stories each month
  • Our email newsletter
  • Webinars and ebooks in one click
  • Our Solutions of the Year magazine
  • Support solutions journalism and preserve access to all readers who work to liberate cities

Join 947 other sustainers such as:

  • Matt at $60/Year
  • Anonymous at $10/Month
  • Joana at $5/Month

Already a member? Log in here. U.S. donations are tax-deductible minus the value of thank-you gifts. Questions? Learn more about our membership options.

or pay by credit card:

All members are automatically signed-up to our email newsletter. You can unsubscribe with one-click at any time.

  • Solutions of the year 2022

    Donate $20 or $5/Month

    2022-2023 Solutions of the Year magazine

  • Brave New Home

    Donate $40 or $10/Month

    Brave New Home by Diana Lind