Seattle Transit Cuts Would Render Streetcar Line Unusable
The Works

Seattle Transit Cuts Would Render Streetcar Line Unusable

The main objective of streetcars like Seattle’s is not to move people productively, and despite the large capital investment, they may be the first to go if transit agencies have to tighten their belts.

This is your first of three free stories this month. Become a free or sustaining member to read unlimited articles, webinars and ebooks.

Become A Member

‘Tis the season for transit doomsday plans. As public transit authorities continue their half-century duel with politicians over funding, desperate agencies sometimes release so-called doomsday maps and schedules, which show how service would get cut if money for operations and capital improvements is not forthcoming. SEPTA, which serves the Philadelphia region, released its plea to Pennsylvania state legislators in November with a drastically scaled-back rail map. Now, it’s Seattle’s turn.

King County Metro recently unveiled service cuts that would go into effect next year if funding needs aren’t met, and one thing stands out: The South Lake Union streetcar would be rendered almost completely useless. With just two trains per hour in each direction during most of the day, the line would be reduced to a very expensive paratransit service, occasionally rolling by for those physically unable to walk the line’s 1.3-mile length.

Peak service would be trimmed to one train every 15 minutes — right now area employers pay to have 10-minute frequencies in the afternoon — and service would become half-hourly during the day and on weekends. Trains would stop altogether at 7pm, meaning that even office workers couldn’t always rely on them. For a line whose entire length takes less than 30 minutes to walk, these frequencies would make the streetcar meaningless to everybody not commuting during rush hour, and even for many of those who do.

But while South Lake Union service would be cut in half, the total cut in the operating budget is only 17 percent. To explain why some services like the streetcar were cut more than others, Metro wrote the following on its website:

The guidelines also help us make the best use of fewer transit dollars by keeping service where it’s needed most: highly productive routes that carry many riders, low-income and minority communities where many people rely on buses, and routes that get people to key destinations across King County.

The implication is clear: Despite the tens of millions of dollars in capital investment, King County Metro does not consider the streetcar a particularly efficient mode of transit, and doesn’t think it will be missed as much as its higher-ridership bus lines.

It’s not surprising that a very short line — it runs from South Lake Union, increasingly Amazon’s company town in the city, through Belltown and then ends at the edge of downtown Seattle — that runs in mixed traffic with no dedicated lane isn’t very productive at moving people. But mobility isn’t really a factor in the nation’s recent streetcar revival, as many backers will readily admit. Rather, streetcars are supposed to encourage development. Cause and effect are debatable, but South Lake Union has experienced a boom in growth, largely centered around Amazon and its employees, since the line opened six years ago.

But as Metro’s doomsday plan shows, the inability to move people efficiently sometimes has consequences for streetcars. When money gets tight, they’re the first to go. Rail may signal permanence but, just like Seattle’s prewar streetcar network and the waterfront light rail line that closed in 2005, any service can be undone.

The Works is made possible with the support of the Surdna Foundation.

Stephen J. Smith is a reporter based in New York. He has written about transportation, infrastructure and real estate for a variety of publications including New York Yimby, where he is currently an editor, Next City, City Lab and the New York Observer.

Tags: infrastructurepublic transportationseattlethe worksstreetcarsretail

×
Next City App Never Miss A StoryDownload our app ×
×

You've reached your monthly limit of three free stories.

This is not a paywall. Become a free or sustaining member to continue reading.

  • Read unlimited stories each month
  • Our email newsletter
  • Webinars and ebooks in one click
  • Our Solutions of the Year magazine
  • Support solutions journalism and preserve access to all readers who work to liberate cities

Join 787 other sustainers such as:

  • Anonymous in Milwaukee, WI at $120/Year
  • Anonymous at $10/Month
  • Anonymous in Walnut Creek, CA at $10/Month

Already a member? Log in here. U.S. donations are tax-deductible minus the value of thank-you gifts. Questions? Learn more about our membership options.

or pay by credit card:

All members are automatically signed-up to our email newsletter. You can unsubscribe with one-click at any time.

  • Donate $20 or $5/Month

    The 21 Best Solutions of 2021 special edition magazine

  • Donate $40 or $10/Month

    Brave New Home by Diana Lind