Privatizing the Streets

Cities need you. Support Next City and have your gift matched.Donate

Privatizing the Streets

A quick look across the pond reveals a London faced with both the best and the worst of all possible options for the future shape of London, with Mayor Boris Johnson leading the charge for revitalizing public spaces in danger of being privatized.

Some grim news from London: apparently there’s a growing trend toward selling developers entire chunks of the city, streets and all, leading to archipelago of private neighborhoods within the city with their own security guards and rules regarding appropriate behavior:

[Privatized streets] raise a challenge to the kind of public life, culture and democracy that has been taken for granted in British cities for the last 150 years. A host of seemingly innocuous activities – skateboarding, rollerblading, even eating in some places – are routinely banned, along with filming and, of course, taking photographs. So is begging, homelessness, selling the Big Issue, handing out political leaflets, and holding political demonstrations. It’s a very different and far less democratic idea of the city and citizenship. In place of the diversity of high streets we are creating sterile, high-security enclaves, policed by private security and CCTV. And rather than making us feel safer, the emphasis on security is a reminder of ever-present danger, fuelling fear of crime.

This is essentially a recipe for removing all vitality from street life in these areas. Luckily, London’s Mayor, Boris Johnson, is opposed to such arrangements and is actually in a place to do something about it as he can “can direct boroughs to refuse permission for new schemes” that lead to the privatization of traditionally public spaces. His own views on public spaces are straight from the livable streets playbook and he has committed £220 million to creating new parks and squares within the city as well as to revitalize central pedestrian areas:

Johnson said he wanted to make public space in the capital as “unrestricted and unambiguous” as possible by minimising traffic lights, removing railings and formal pedestrian crossings – and in some instances pavements too – and relying instead on pedestrians, cyclists and road users “negotiating” street space.

All of which is music to my ears. So it seems we have both the very best and the very worst options on the table for the future shape of London. Let’s hope Johnson gets his way.

Tags: infrastructurereal estategovernancelondon

Next City App Never Miss A StoryDownload our app ×

You've reached your monthly limit of three free stories.

This is not a paywall. Become a free or sustaining member to continue reading.

  • Read unlimited stories each month
  • Our email newsletter
  • Webinars and ebooks in one click
  • Our Solutions of the Year magazine
  • Support solutions journalism and preserve access to all readers who work to liberate cities

Join 838 other sustainers such as:

  • Joseph at $5/Month
  • Anonymous at $40/Year
  • Anonymous in Shreveport, LA at $5/Month

Already a member? Log in here. U.S. donations are tax-deductible minus the value of thank-you gifts. Questions? Learn more about our membership options.

or pay by credit card:

All members are automatically signed-up to our email newsletter. You can unsubscribe with one-click at any time.

  • Donate $20 or $5/Month

    The 21 Best Solutions of 2021 special edition magazine

  • Donate $40 or $10/Month

    Brave New Home by Diana Lind