Old New York?

New Yorkers are going gray, along with the rest of the nation. Is the city financially prepared to effectively care for the elderly?

This is your first of three free stories this month. Become a free or sustaining member to read unlimited articles, webinars and ebooks.

Become A Member

America’s largest city is going gray. As sociologist Sharon Zukin (full disclosure: Zukin spoke at Gelf Magazine’s Geeking Out: The Anatomy of the Big Apple, hosted by yours truly, last month) http://blog.oup.com/2010/10/age-and-the-city/ recently pointed out, is projected to rise 44.2% from 2000 to 2030. The reason? Not surprisingly, it’s the baby boom generation, which, while only arguably responsible for the national debt and Botox, will inevitably cause a substantial rise in elderly populations throughout the U.S.

What does this mean for New York, and other large cities? Will, as Zukin writes, Whole Foods Market at Union Square be empty by 3 p.m.? Though I don’t shop at Whole Foods, I wouldn’t mind living in a city where everyone runs errands on weekdays so much.

Sadly, for those of us braving lines at Key Food on Saturdays, New York is unlikely to become a retirement community. Though the over-65 population is forecast to rise quickly, it will still only be 14.8% of the city’s residents. That’s hardly enough to turn Manhattan into Del Boca Vista.

The crucial thing, though, is that is the share of elderly in 2030 will nearly equal the share of school-age children, projected to stand at 15.4% – as opposed to 17.2% in 2000. Zukin quite reasonably asks if this will cause money to shift from “chronically underfunded schools” to “chronically underfunded public hospitals and senior centers.”

Which points to the main problem: caring for all of those elderly people is really, really expensive. In “Toward an Age Friendly New York City,” a report on the city’s response to aging, one of many elderly people interviewed noted that in the past “you got school, health and dental. They should take care of us now.” While I certainly think we should care for our senior citizens, it must be noted that it is Medicare that is bankrupting this country, not TARP. Society surely has a responsibility towards its elderly, but the terms of that contract need to be renegotiated, and soon.

However, there are some things that we younger New Yorkers can do. Another respondent to the “Age Friendly”survey said “they won’t let senior citizens into those restaurants in the trendy areas.” I don’t know that they actually will not let senior citizens in – which would be pretty blatant age discrimination – but the next time I see an older couple in a trendy restaurant, I’ll smile and nod. I have no desire to live surrounded only by the young, hip and attractive. Contrary to popular opinion, this city is big enough for all of us, even if its budget isn’t.

Like what you’re reading? Get a browser notification whenever we post a new story. You’re signed-up for browser notifications of new stories. No longer want to be notified? Unsubscribe.

Tags: new york citybuilt environmenthealthcarebaby boomers

Next City App Never Miss A StoryDownload our app ×

You've reached your monthly limit of three free stories.

This is not a paywall. Become a free or sustaining member to continue reading.

  • Read unlimited stories each month
  • Our email newsletter
  • Webinars and ebooks in one click
  • Our Solutions of the Year magazine
  • Support solutions journalism and preserve access to all readers who work to liberate cities

Join 1106 other sustainers such as:

  • Anonymous at $10/Month
  • Anonymous in Cleveland, OH at $5/Month
  • Bruce in Muncie, IN at $60/Year

Already a member? Log in here. U.S. donations are tax-deductible minus the value of thank-you gifts. Questions? Learn more about our membership options.

or pay by credit card:

All members are automatically signed-up to our email newsletter. You can unsubscribe with one-click at any time.

  • Donate $20 or $5/Month

    20th Anniversary Solutions of the Year magazine

has donated ! Thank you 🎉