LIVEBLOG: Legacy and Innovation Conference Sparks a Group Therapy Session

The Legacy and Innovation conference at University of Pennsylvania has yielded a surprisingly emotional conversation about Philadelphia’s growth.

This is your first of three free stories this month. Become a free or sustaining member to read unlimited articles, webinars and ebooks.

Become A Member

It’s an unlikely outcome of a university symposium, but at the Legacy and Innovation conference at the University of Pennsylvania today, experts from Philadelphia and beyond convened to talk about Philly’s remaining status as a legacy city. We patted ourselves on the back for how we have grown over the past decade: Literally, Philadelphia has added thousands of new residents, innovated especially in terms of sustainability and revitalized its Navy Yard. But 26 percent of the city lives in poverty, it still has thousands of vacant lots, and its industries aren’t as strong as they could be.

What was surprising is that so many people, from Jeremy Nowak of the Philadelphia Fed to Barry Seymour of DVRPC, were willing to engage in the discussion, pointing out the good while accepting the bad. Nowak noted that while we’re all celebrating the “urban moment” that has brought a new generation of people to cities across the country, we ignore that we’re not growing the younger demographics or the people over 35 who’ve left Philadelphia for the suburbs. Seymour noted that we should think beyond just legacy assets to consider networks and the other intangibles that derive from the legacy city fabric. In other words, it’s not just the physical assets that are unproductive. Our social, cultural and institutional networks also aren’t as innovative as they need to be.

This kind of reasonable conversation seems like a good foundation for whatever comes next. Philly can’t just champion the good while ignoring how much more aggressively we need to attack the flaws. We still need to do a better job of providing basic services, speeding up and structuring economic development to benefit a greater population, connecting old industries to the new, growing these new industries such as pharamaceuticals, and ultimately connecting this all back to some of the more chronic problems that plague legacy cities, like poor education and a lack of jobs for people without college degrees.

Like what you’re reading? Get a browser notification whenever we post a new story. You’re signed-up for browser notifications of new stories. No longer want to be notified? Unsubscribe.

Diana Lind is the former executive director and editor in chief of Next City.

Tags: philadelphiaeconomic developmentpublic schoolsanchor institutions

Next City App Never Miss A StoryDownload our app ×

You've reached your monthly limit of three free stories.

This is not a paywall. Become a free or sustaining member to continue reading.

  • Read unlimited stories each month
  • Our email newsletter
  • Webinars and ebooks in one click
  • Our Solutions of the Year magazine
  • Support solutions journalism and preserve access to all readers who work to liberate cities

Join 1107 other sustainers such as:

  • Anonymous in Flushing, NY at $25/Year
  • Anonymous at $25/Year
  • Alison at $60/Year

Already a member? Log in here. U.S. donations are tax-deductible minus the value of thank-you gifts. Questions? Learn more about our membership options.

or pay by credit card:

All members are automatically signed-up to our email newsletter. You can unsubscribe with one-click at any time.

  • Donate $20 or $5/Month

    20th Anniversary Solutions of the Year magazine

has donated ! Thank you 🎉