House: Actually, We’d Rather Not Drastically Cut Transportation Spending

In a landslide vote, the House defeated a motion to slash federal transportation funding by nearly a third. Turns out Republicans may not be as opposed to federal support for transportation than previously believed.

The motion, which would have slashed federal transportation funding by nearly 30 percent, was defeated 323-82. Credit: Mike Renlund on Flickr

An important development in the ongoing debate over the House transportation bill almost slipped past the news cycle on Friday. In a landslide vote, the House defeated a motion to slash federal transportation funding by nearly a third, Streetsblog reports.

Had it passed, the motion would have forced the bill’s conference committee to limit transportation spending to resources available from the Highway Trust Fund, which uses money gathered from the federal fuel tax to help pay for both highways and mass transit. This would have translated to a reduction of about 30 percent in spending

But in a rare instance of bipartisanship, the motion — introduced by Georgia Republican Paul Broun with blessings from several right-wing groups — was defeated in a 323-82 vote.

The key takeaway here, as Streetsblog’s Ben Goldman writes, is that “more Democrats and Republicans agree on more of the transportation bill than they’re leading us to believe.” And if more Republicans than previously thought are on board with federal support for transportation, it may mean that advocates won’t have to concede too much after all.

Yonah Freemark, writing over at Next American City web partner The Transport Politic, explains:

If last week’s vote proves anything, it is that support for the idea that spending on transportation should be limited to user revenues is confined to a right-wing minority so far on the sidelines that it does not even account for half of House Republicans. Faced with the choice between drastically reduced spending on infrastructure…or keep spending in line with demand, rather than the money available, the majority of elected officials across the political spectrum continue to select the latter.

The House has been bogged down for months over how to proceed on the transportation issue. While the Senate passed a relatively transit- and pedestrian-friendly bill in March, the House stalled after abandoning HR 7, a controversial bill that would have caused transit advocates, cyclists and pedestrians all kinds of headaches. Instead, the House wound up settling for a 90-day extension of the current transportation policy, which expires at the end of this month.

For now, some are calling for the House to follow in the Senate’s footsteps. Since it’s become increasingly clear that smart growth and transit-oriented development aren’t necessarily antithetical to conservative values, this may prove easier than one might think.

Tags: infrastructurepublic transportationwashington dcgovernancebikingyonah freemark

Next City App Never Miss A StoryDownload our app ×

You've reached your monthly limit of three free stories.

This is not a paywall. Become a free or sustaining member to continue reading.

  • Read unlimited stories each month
  • Our email newsletter
  • Webinars and ebooks in one click
  • Our Solutions of the Year magazine
  • Support solutions journalism and preserve access to all readers who work to liberate cities

Join 881 other sustainers such as:

  • Chip in Bethesda, MD at $300/Year
  • Stephanie in Pawtucket, RI at $5/Month
  • Kristin in Detroit, MI at $5/Month

Already a member? Log in here. U.S. donations are tax-deductible minus the value of thank-you gifts. Questions? Learn more about our membership options.

or pay by credit card:

All members are automatically signed-up to our email newsletter. You can unsubscribe with one-click at any time.

  • Donate $20 or $5/Month

    2022-2023 Solutions of the Year magazine

  • Donate $40 or $10/Month

    Brave New Home by Diana Lind