For Some in the Southwest, It’s Come to Selling Water to Fracking Companies
Watermark

For Some in the Southwest, It’s Come to Selling Water to Fracking Companies

In drought-stricken Texas and New Mexico, swarms of drillers are after shale oil deep beneath the dry soil. Some citizens have taken to selling what little water they have to prospective frackers to get by.

Hydrofracking requires up to 6 million gallons of water per well. Credit: Helen Slottje via Ari Moore on Flickr

This is your first of three free stories this month. Become a free or sustaining member to read unlimited articles, webinars and ebooks.

Become A Member

Under the dry soil of Texas and New Mexico, there is shale oil. It’s a natural resource that has been touted as a solution to the country’s energy problem, a game-changing asset in the national portfolio. One Harvard researcher predicted in June that “increased shale oil production may significantly alter the U.S. energy outlook,” and that by 2017 the U.S. could be the top oil producer in the world.

To get that shale oil, energy companies have turned to hydrofracturing, popularly known as fracking. The nickname leaves out the “hydro” part, but make no mistake: Fracking requires water. Lots and lots of water, on the order of 4 to 6 million gallons per well.

And in the drought-stricken states of Texas and New Mexico, where the productive Permian shale formation has attracted swarms of drillers, water is in short supply.

Now lots of people in west Texas and New Mexico make money not by ranching and farming, as they once did. There’s not enough water for that anymore. Instead, they get by selling what water they have to fracking companies.

The Guardian ran a story this month about the small Texas town of Barnhart, which temporarily ran out of drinking water in July (not unlike the town of Magdalena, New Mexico, which I wrote about earlier this week). The town’s water problems stem a number of sources, including heavy agricultural use in the past and a drought that has stretched on for three years now. But the fracking hasn’t slowed:

Even as the drought bore down, even as the water levels declined, the oil industry continued to demand water and those with water on their land were willing to sell it. The road west of town was lined with signs advertising “fresh water”, where tankers can take on a box-car-sized load of water laced with industrial chemicals.

“If you’re going to develop the oil, you’ve got to have the water,” said Larry Baxter, a contractor from the nearby town of Mertzon, who installed two frack tanks on his land earlier this year, hoping to make a business out of his well selling water to oil industry…. He rejected the idea there should be any curbs on selling water during the drought. “People use their water for food and fibre. I choose to use my water to sell to the oil field,” he said. “Who’s taking advantage? I don’t see any difference.”

According to the Texas Tribune, a University of Texas study found that in Dimmit County, Texas, nearly one-quarter of total water used in 2011 went to fracking, a share that could rise to one-third if current trends continue. The study also showed that between 2008 and 2011, the amount of water used for fracking doubled statewide, and only one-fifth of that was recycled or brackish water.

In New Mexico, according to the Albuquerque Journal, landowners in the Carlsbad Irrigation District can’t sell water from their primary water source. But if they have what’s classified as a supplemental well, they can get a permit to do so. And that’s the course that many are choosing — somewhat ironically, because there’s not enough water provided by the irrigation district for them to continue farming.

“A lot of folks are doing that,” New Mexico Interstate Stream Commissioner Jim Wilcox told the Journal. “I can’t blame them. The Carlsbad Irrigation District doesn’t have the water the farmers need, and our farmers have to have some income coming in.”

“The oil and gas industry is requiring a lot of water and our concern is the effect it’s having on our aquifer,” he added. “We are concerned about losing water that can’t be recovered. Hopefully, we will get through this drought and everyone will be intact.”

The going rate for water is soaring in this part of New Mexico, up from 25 cents for a 42-gallon barrel seven years ago to $1 a barrel today.

The market is recognizing the value of water in an arid region where aquifers recharge very slowly — and not at all in drought years. The question is whether state regulators will follow suit, or just keep hoping for rain.

Watermark is made possible with the support of the Surdna Foundation.

Sarah Goodyear has written about cities for a variety of publications, including CityLab, Grist and Streetsblog. She lives in Brooklyn.

Follow Sarah

Tags: infrastructureenergywatermark

×
Next City App Never Miss A StoryDownload our app ×
×

You've reached your monthly limit of three free stories.

This is not a paywall. Become a free or sustaining member to continue reading.

  • Read unlimited stories each month
  • Our email newsletter
  • Webinars and ebooks in one click
  • Our Solutions of the Year magazine
  • Support solutions journalism and preserve access to all readers who work to liberate cities

Join 652 other sustainers such as:

  • Dina in San Francisco, CA at $60/Year
  • Anonymous at $10/Month
  • Andrew in Philadelphia, PA at $5/Month

Already a member? Log in here. U.S. donations are tax-deductible minus the value of thank-you gifts. Questions? Learn more about our membership options.

or pay by credit card:

All members are automatically signed-up to our email newsletter. You can unsubscribe with one-click at any time.

  • Donate $10 or $5/Month

    Next City notebook

  • Donate $20 or $5/Month

    The 21 Best Solutions of 2021 special edition magazine

  • Donate $40 or $10/Month

    Brave New Home by Diana Lind