End Comes for Alhambra Redevelopment Agency

Cities need you. Support Next City and have your gift matched.Donate

End Comes for Alhambra Redevelopment Agency

As California tries to get its budget in order, many local agencies are on the line. In Alhambra, the institution responsible for huge leaps in redevelopment will not survive into February. What does this mean for business, jobs and progress in this largely immigrant-populated city?

How many jobs will be lost following the Alhambra agency’s dissolution? Wikipedia user Jey0h

This piece originally ran in the Alhambra Source. It concerns an example of how a recent California state law dissolving redevelopment agencies affects local communities.

The Alhambra Redevelopment Agency will cease to exist as of February 1, like dozens of others throughout California, and the city of Alhambra is charged with selling off assets and finding a successor agency. 

City Manager Julio Fuentes told the Pasadena Star-News that two of three current redevelopment projects may be in jeopardy: Alhambra Place, the site of the former Mervyns building which has been vacant since 2009, and the commercial development at Fremont Plaza. The Howard Street Townhome units, an affordable housing project off Main Street, should be protected if a successor housing agency takes over the project, as Fuentes is recommending. The city would assume the debt obligations, but would not receive revenue from the project. 

Fuentes said he does not know how many Alhambra employees will lose their jobs. About half a dozen city employees are paid through the agency. Some have dual appointments, including Fuentes, where the payment supplements other positions.

Monterey Park will probably have to lay off about 10 employees, West Covina between 40 and 60 employees, and Covina six to 10 employees, according to the San Gabriel Valley Tribune. Los Angeles voted Wednesday to discard its redevelopment agency and its 192 employees, the Los Angeles Times reports. 

The role of redevelopment agencies has been hotly debated as the state attempts to fix its budget. Proponents say that the agencies are instrumental in turning blighted areas into vibrant business centers. 

“Redevelopment has created value where there was no value before that,” said Councilwoman Barbara Messina at Monday’s City Coucil meeting. “You look at our Toys R Us. There was no value attached to that property. You look at the two parking structures we built. We created value for our city.”

Opponents, however, say that tax revenue that was supposed to be directed for blighted areas has now been used as a general development fund. California Governor Jerry Brown determined that these funds would be better directed toward schools and other public services.

Tags: jerry brown

×
Next City App Never Miss A StoryDownload our app ×
×

You've reached your monthly limit of three free stories.

This is not a paywall. Become a free or sustaining member to continue reading.

  • Read unlimited stories each month
  • Our email newsletter
  • Webinars and ebooks in one click
  • Our Solutions of the Year magazine
  • Support solutions journalism and preserve access to all readers who work to liberate cities

Join 837 other sustainers such as:

  • Anonymous in Shreveport, LA at $5/Month
  • Karis in Rocky River, OH at $100/Year
  • Jolene in Chicago, IL at $75/Year

Already a member? Log in here. U.S. donations are tax-deductible minus the value of thank-you gifts. Questions? Learn more about our membership options.

or pay by credit card:

All members are automatically signed-up to our email newsletter. You can unsubscribe with one-click at any time.

  • Donate $20 or $5/Month

    The 21 Best Solutions of 2021 special edition magazine

  • Donate $40 or $10/Month

    Brave New Home by Diana Lind