Economics in Brief: Where the Money Goes in Chicago
The Bottom LineThe Bottom Line

Economics in Brief: Where the Money Goes in Chicago

And in other economics stories this week, a hospital refuses a large TIF subsidy, and Congress takes a look at whether to extend or make permanent a small business lending program reaching women and minorities.

(Photo by Adam Courtemanche / CC BY-ND 2.0)

This is your first of three free stories this month. Become a free or sustaining member to read unlimited articles, webinars and ebooks.

Become A Member

Money Flows to Chicago’s White, Wealthy Neighborhoods by Wide Margins

A new Urban Institute report looked at public, private and mission-driven investment in Chicago’s single-family, multifamily, commercial and industrial real estate from the years 2011 to 2017. The report’s conclusions? Money isn’t going where it’s needed.

Low-poverty neighborhoods received more than four times as much private investment per household than high-poverty neighborhoods, the report found. White neighborhoods received more than 4 times as much private investment per household as majority-black neighborhoods, and 2.6 times as much investment as majority Latino neighborhoods.

On the public side, the picture is different: high-poverty neighborhoods received ten times the public dollars. But the amounts are so vastly different, there’s no balance, Brett Theodos, author of the study, told WBEZ. According to the report, market sources provided $67 billion in investment, compared to $4 billion of mission-driven lending.

“Chicago has grown an exceptional community development and mission finance infrastructure. And yet, the sums these sources are investing are still small relative to market capital flows, and many neighborhoods are not adequately served by either mission or mainstream finance,” the report says. “It will be necessary to grow and deepen the mission finance sector, but mainstream capital must also be drawn into a broader set of neighborhoods.”

For more on what this report means to housing specifically, keep an eye out for Next City’s Backyard newsletter (subscribe here), where senior housing correspondent Jared Brey will take a deep dive into this report next week.

Presence Health, a Catholic Hospital, Gives Up $5.5 Million TIF

In other Chicago news, Presence Health, Illinois’s largest Catholic health system, announced late last week that it wouldn’t take $5.5 million in TIF money to renovate its new headquarters. (Have you read our senior economics correspondent Oscar Perry Abello’s story about TIF in Chicago yet?) The hospital system’s subsidy had been approved in January 2018, over the objections of 18 aldermen, including Brendan Reilly (42nd) who said that public money shouldn’t be used to subsidize a health system that didn’t provide reproductive health services such as contraception and abortion, Block Club Chicago reports.

Presence Health was purchased by AMITA Health last year, and last week AMITA said it had “decided not to complete the paperwork required to finalize the Presence Health TIF agreement.” Presence’s downtown headquarters, as well as a planned cancer center and neighborhood clinics, will proceed even without the subsidy, CEO Mark A. Frey said in a statement.

Congress Considers Community Lending

The House Small Business Subcommittee on Investigations, Oversight & Regulations convened a panel Tuesday to discuss whether to make the SBA’s Community Advantage 7(a) loan program, which serves underserved communities, permanent.

The program was meant to focus on startups and woman-, veteran-, and minority-owned small businesses. In 2017, it gave out just $138 million in loans, American Banker reports, but plays a critical role reaching underserved groups who can’t obtain credit otherwise.

Last year, the SBA made changes to the program, including bumping up potential borrowers’ minimum credit scores and placing a moratorium on new lenders, with the goal of improving the repayment rate on the loans it gives out. From June 30, 2017 to June 30, 2018, Community Advantage loans had a 4 percent default rate. Supporters argued that while a typical borrower’s risk profile is higher than that of a “bankable business,” the program is intended to reach people who can’t get financing through other means, so a slightly higher default rate shouldn’t be considered a problem.

The program was created in 2011 and is set to expire in 2022 if not extended. Rep. Judy Chu (D-CA) said in a statement that she supports extending the program.

This article is part of The Bottom Line, a series exploring scalable solutions for problems related to affordability, inclusive economic growth and access to capital. Click here to subscribe to our Bottom Line newsletter. The Bottom Line is made possible with support from Citi.

Tags: chicagosmall businesscongresstax increment financing

×
Next City App Never Miss A StoryDownload our app ×
×

You've reached your monthly limit of three free stories.

This is not a paywall. Become a free or sustaining member to continue reading.

  • Read unlimited stories each month
  • Our email newsletter
  • Webinars and ebooks in one click
  • Our Solutions of the Year magazine
  • Support solutions journalism and preserve access to all readers who work to liberate cities

Join 652 other sustainers such as:

  • Dina in San Francisco, CA at $60/Year
  • Anonymous at $10/Month
  • Andrew in Philadelphia, PA at $5/Month

Already a member? Log in here. U.S. donations are tax-deductible minus the value of thank-you gifts. Questions? Learn more about our membership options.

or pay by credit card:

All members are automatically signed-up to our email newsletter. You can unsubscribe with one-click at any time.

  • Donate $10 or $5/Month

    Next City notebook

  • Donate $20 or $5/Month

    The 21 Best Solutions of 2021 special edition magazine

  • Donate $40 or $10/Month

    Brave New Home by Diana Lind