Dealing With the Stigma Against Bus Travel

In an article for The Atlantic Cities, Amanda Hess addresses how race and class affect perceptions of bus travel. But to maintain and extend ridership, bus lines should stay focused on being cheap, inclusive and convenient.

This is your first of three free stories this month. Become a free or sustaining member to read unlimited articles, webinars and ebooks.

Become A Member

This week in The Atlantic Cities, Amanda Hess addresses the stigma attached to bus travel and how it affects transit initiatives. In response to this issue, so often tinged with race and class, she asks, “can a city actually successfully gentrify its bus system?” — and, perhaps more importantly, “does it want to?”

According to the American Public Transportation Association, bus ridership still outnumbers all forms of rail-based travel combined and has increased at nearly same pace as light rail, which is often pitted against bus travel as a more popular and convenient alternative.

The argument of whether a stigma against buses should be addressed is irrelevant to the commuters and urban dwellers depending on public transit, but to so-called “choice riders” — who decide to use public transit despite having other options — perceptions make a difference. But how much power do these riders actually have, and how much do negative perceptions affect their choices?

They do, of course, have the option not to choose public transit, a choice that differentiates them from the rest of transit riders as the one demographic that cities feel must fought for. The rest, for better or worst, are obliged to the bus.

The “conceptual road block,” as Hess refers to it, of how buses are perceived then becomes an issue that transit companies can isolate and address specifically for that demographic.

The Department of Transportation notes in a report that “an articulated brand identity” can help draw choice riders. But if many of the solutions to this stigmatization coincide with the broad needs of all riders, why begin with “gimmickry” such as paint jobs and re-branding?

While the Circulator, a successful bus line in Washington, D.C., has utilized distinctive paint jobs and marketed itself as “unlike any other public transit in town,” it has also maintained a cheap fare and expanded its service into predominately black neighborhoods. This is an example of how addressing general needs, ultimately, creates a better bus line.

Catering to perceptions of race and class overextends the role of the bus line, which to maintain and extend ridership should stay focused on being cheap, inclusive and convenient.

Like what you’re reading? Get a browser notification whenever we post a new story. You’re signed-up for browser notifications of new stories. No longer want to be notified? Unsubscribe.

Tags: infrastructurepublic transportationwashington dcgentrificationlight railbuses

×
Next City App Never Miss A StoryDownload our app ×
×

You've reached your monthly limit of three free stories.

This is not a paywall. Become a free or sustaining member to continue reading.

  • Read unlimited stories each month
  • Our email newsletter
  • Webinars and ebooks in one click
  • Our Solutions of the Year magazine
  • Support solutions journalism and preserve access to all readers who work to liberate cities

Join 1106 other sustainers such as:

  • Bruce in Muncie, IN at $60/Year
  • John in Dayton, OH at $120/Year
  • Andrea at $100/Year

Already a member? Log in here. U.S. donations are tax-deductible minus the value of thank-you gifts. Questions? Learn more about our membership options.

or pay by credit card:

All members are automatically signed-up to our email newsletter. You can unsubscribe with one-click at any time.

  • Donate $20 or $5/Month

    20th Anniversary Solutions of the Year magazine

has donated ! Thank you 🎉
Donate
×